View Single Post
Old Today, 12:51   #394
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 8,335
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: The gender ideology thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/co...o-vip-hotline/

I didn’t know that the BBC owned HMRC. Or is it the other way round, appropriately?

Any confidentiality issues are limited to tax, nothing else. Not sure the media would be that interested, so what's the issue?

---------- Post added at 13:51 ---------- Previous post was at 13:35 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Worth pointing out that those who actually have a GRC are a very tiny minority of our so-called ‘transgender’ population. Most people who say they’re transgender are just crossdressers, a few are body-modders (mainly hormone treatment, sometimes surgery), and a very few go the whole hog and apply to get their documents changed. In these cases the State has to pretend it doesn’t know that a man is a man (or vice versa) and treat him as a woman, and that involves as few public sector workers as possible getting access to any official record that might give the game away.

You can put this down to the law of unintended consequences behaving as normal rather than any deliberate attempt to plate favourites.
The system for VIPs is to avoid all and sundry looking up their details. How could that happen where all and sundry don't even know a persons name, never mind that they exist. No valid purpose to this.
nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote