Thread: Three teens virtually get away with rape
View Single Post
Old Today, 19:52   #11
jem
cf.addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SE London (Bexley)
Services: None - well none with VM!
Posts: 414
jem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful one
Re: Three teens virtually get away with rape
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itshim View Post
Will MPs take control of this , simply pass a law with minimum sentences. Ie one rape 10 years + 2 rapes 30 years + . Of cause that would be so simple.
The problem with that is that you will, absolutely will, run up against an exception, where someone is mandatorily sentenced to a minimum term, whereas the particular circumstances of the case might lend itself to a lighter sentence.

The current system is where Parliament sets maximum sentences and authorises ‘guidelines’ which Judges are expected to follow. It seems to me that in this case, it wasn’t followed, but there are mechanisms to correct this obvious failure of the judicial system to reflect public opinion.

I have little doubt that the sentence will, absolutely, be reviewed and the perpetrators given a more appropriate punishment.

But I think that one bad choice doesn't mean the entire system is bad, yes give Judges guidelines but with a degree of latitude depending on the particular facts of the case. But do have mechanism to correct obvious failings, which we do.
__________________
"I believe in an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out"
Arthur Hays Sulzberger
jem is offline   Reply With Quote