View Single Post
Old Today, 09:10   #4
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 8,328
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: 3 teens virtually get away with rape

Mind boggling the excuses some have come up with.
Not as if it as a drunken spur of the one-off moment thing.
Quote:
"But this judge has come to the conclusion that help is required rather than punishment.
"It's a brave step to take... you can see why he's done it because the law says that children's welfare takes precedence over most other things."
...
Joseph said in her experience of sentencing, it was "not successful" sending a 15 or 16-year-old into a young offenders institution, where they then go on to prisons.
She said it would expose them to "such bad influences".
Quote:
Explaining his sentencing decision on Thursday, Judge Nicholas Rowland said he would avoid "criminalising" the "very young" boys.
nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote