Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
No, she didn’t…
You stated "deliberately", HMRC said it wasn’t…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx219y4qy0qo
---------- Post added at 14:58 ---------- Previous post was at 14:56 ----------
Anyway, back on topic…
Streeting appears to be chickening out of challenging Starmer… |
The intention for transferring 50% of the property and then selling her remaining 25% interest was to avoid higher stamp duty. That is why she considered she didn't have to pay it. Why on earth would you transfer 50% of the ownership? Leaving behind 25% for the ex-husband, who can do nothing with it. He can't sell it. Who's left paying the mortgage? The mortgage provider can't(and shouldn't) be too happy with transferring of ownership. That is their security on the loan.