|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
They were STILL being built. There was NO INCREASED REQUIREMENT as a result.
---------- Post added at 12:20 ---------- Previous post was at 12:19 ----------
No NET impact. The number being housed didn't change.
---------- Post added at 12:21 ---------- Previous post was at 12:20 ----------
Labour closed more mines.
---------- Post added at 12:25 ---------- Previous post was at 12:21 ----------
He didn't underpay. He paid it instead as income tax.
Rayner deliberately and intentionally underpaid stamp duty, CGT, and right to buy discount refund.
50% of the property was transferred to her son, with her remaining 25% sold to his trust. Sidestepping CGT and higher stamp duty. confused about the whole situation surrounding that. Doesn't make legal sense.
|
No, she didn’t…
You stated "deliberately", HMRC said it wasn’t…
Quote:
Rayner said she welcomed the HMRC's conclusion that "there wasn't any wrongdoing and that I didn't try to avoid paying tax, and I wasn't careless in the way I conducted myself".
The BBC has seen an email from the tax authority to Rayner's lawyers which verifies that HMRC regards the matter as closed.
HMRC also spells out in the email that Rayner will not face a penalty charge.
A penalty is incurred if a tax error is "careless" or "deliberate".
|
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx219y4qy0qo
---------- Post added at 14:58 ---------- Previous post was at 14:56 ----------
Anyway, back on topic…
Streeting appears to be chickening out of challenging Starmer…
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|