Thread: Starmer’s chronicles
View Single Post
Old Today, 11:53   #2675
OLD BOY
Rise above the players
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 with 360, ITVX, 4+, Prime, Netflix, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount+, Discovery+, HBO Max
Posts: 15,338
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
I like seeing the sod squirm. One question though: Did Olly Robbins know that the mandelson vetting had failed? Point being if he didn’t know, but as head of the FO service, Robbins fell on his sword, tghen Starmer should do the same.

Kemi also needs to ask what instructions the FO has received from No. 10 in respect of gwetting Mandelson through the process. Obviously, Starmer can’t wriggle out of that.



---------- Post added at 10:37 ---------- Previous post was at 10:37 ----------



Pillow talk risk?
Starmer can wriggle out of any question by answering another question that nobody asked.

I really don’t know how there can be so much confusion over this. Who was the outcome of the security check passed to? What did they do with that information and who made the decision to ignore it? Whoever that was, I’m sure they will be able to tell us if the PM was informed, and if not, why not?

The fact that they still haven’t got to the bottom of this does indicate to me that something’s being covered up.
__________________
Forumbox.co.uk
OLD BOY is offline   Reply With Quote