View Single Post
Old 14-03-2026, 20:26   #1754
jem
cf.addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SE London (Bexley)
Services: None - well none with VM!
Posts: 391
jem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful onejem is the helpful one
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carth View Post
Ensuring a young persons online safety by making them reveal their personal details to anyone that asks is definitely the right way to go . . . says nobody with more than 7 brain cells.

It's just the typical knee jerk reaction of the Government and its army of experts, not just in this case but many over the previous years.
You make a good point, but the issue is not really making a young person reveal their details, it’s making you and I and everyone else over 18, hand over personal details to some third party (probably the cheapest contractor - cheapest for a reason) and trust that they have a degree of competence and won’t allow all of that personal information to be hacked - hint, they won’t.

Do expect that within a year this company will be subject to a ‘sophisticated attack’ - which generally means that some clown (probably in higher management - because the rules don’t apply to them) clicked on a link in an obvious phishing email and coughed up their credentials. And naturally because they are the Senior Vice-President of Marketing and toilet paper, they absolutely have to have full admin rights over the entire system.

Cynic? Me? Absolutely not!
__________________
"I believe in an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out"
Arthur Hays Sulzberger
jem is offline   Reply With Quote