Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
The entire set of posts was about the shooter, who got injured a few months ago, then suddenly you randomly move onto another person. Ok... 
Right ... I'm sure you believe that. 
I still think you are just trying desperately to justify the shooting.
I did notice you completely skipped that part of my previous post. 
In fact, that's almost " unbelievable, mind-boggling, and outright SINISTER". 
You should contact the FBI - they could clearly do with your expertise to clear the officer. |
So have people accepted that when a car is reversing and turning, the front swings around? They constantly say it doesn't, and try to claim it only happens in the UK. Even if it was a 4 wheel steering vehicle, what was in front of any vehicle would still change without anything moving other than the vehicle. They also don't accept that in going from wheels pointing left to pointing right, that they at one stage have to be pointing straight forward. Then there are the claims of "he should've moved, while at the same time claiming he wasn't in front of the vehicle. They seem to think he was several yards away, when it was 1 or 2 yards, They think reactions and actions are instantaneous, with no such things as reaction times involved. People were claiming that she didn't know who she was dealing with and it was like an attempted carjacking.
Things may operate like they claim on another planet, but not in this one.
I have posted conclusive evidence that the vehicle was pointed at him and moving forwards.
Only later when finding about the way he was injured last year, and seeing the link between the 2 situations could I mention it. Still doesn't meant it's not true.
Is any of that not true? When people even refuse to see what happens to them when they move around each and every day, just to support a biased view, then that is beyond sinister.