Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
He literally broke both those rules. He walked all the way around the vehicle and he shot at a vehicle that was moving. You only have to see the bullet hole to know he was in no danger at all, the front left corner of the car is where he stood when he fired the first shot so it was already moving to the right and NOT being driven at him and was barely 3-5mph if even that. Next two shots went in the side window. Again there was ZERO need as vehicle had already gone passed him.
Same for the officer that attempted to open her door, no danger.
|
Highway Code rule 202 on reversing
Quote:
checking all around
looking mainly through the rear window
being aware that the front of your vehicle will swing out as you turn.
|
Now look at the picture in the guidance. If the woman crossing the road, was further over to the left, further across the road, and STANDING STILL, after the car had reversed, she would be in a different position relative front of the car. That's all without her moving.
As I pointed out, the first claimed motorised vehicle pedestrian death was with the car moving at just 4mph.
NOT about what actually happened, but what MIGHT happen. Easy to be knocked off your feet, hit your head and DIE. Multiple examples exist, including being knocked over by a person or a bicycle. He took up a more stable stance with legs slightly apart. He was nudged to the side by the car hitting him. The video from the right from a distance shows that.
I already included a link as to what had happened personally to him a matter of months ago when putting his hands inside a vehicle.
BBC Link
Quote:
Ross needed more than 50 stitches, and had abrasions on his knee, elbow and face, according to the court papers.
...
Ross reached into Muņoz's vehicle with his right hand and attempted to unlock the driver's door. Muņoz drove up on the kerb and accelerated away. Ross's right arm was caught in the vehicle and he was dragged along with it.
|
Don't tell me, needing 50 stitches is just a mere scratch.