View Single Post
Old Today, 11:06   #41
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 43,836
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Re: [Update] BBC DG and head of news resign

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K View Post
Which is the bigger crime , a badly edited documentary or inciting a riot to overturn a democratic election ? Its Trump that should be in court. The US 'justice' system and its constitution are corrupt and bonkers.

Meanwhile Putin eyes up Poland. A real world leader would be turning their attention to that rather than the BBC, making himself richer ,and trying to cover up sex scandals.
Amusingly enough, the person (Prescott) who wrote the report stating the BBC edited Trump’s speech also edited Trump’s speech in the report…

https://www.thenewworld.co.uk/james-...ps-bbc-attack/

Quote:
In the document, Prescott writes:

“Fifteen minutes into the speech, what Trump actually said: ‘We are gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be with you. I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.’ It was completely misleading to edit the clip in the way Panorama aired it.”

But this is not what Donald Trump actually said in his speech. Prescott has heavily edited the remarks, changing their meaning.

And just as Prescott claims there are rules for television, on making it clear when you have edited or abridged a quote, these exist in print, too. If you are abridging a quote, you signify it with an ellipsis. Prescott has not done this.

The full version of the quote that Prescott cites reads very differently. Here it is below, with the sections Prescott uses in bold.

We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them.

“Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong. We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated, lawfully slated.

“I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

---------- Post added at 10:06 ---------- Previous post was at 10:05 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carth View Post
Putin eyes up Poland??

That train 'explosion' could just as well have been a sly attempt by Ukraine to get people thinking . . well, exactly what you probably did.

That nice Mr Zelenski chap needs help, and what better way to get it than stirring up Nato a little more
Strangely enough, that’s what the Ruski bots are posting…
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.

If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Hugh is online now   Reply With Quote