View Single Post
Old Yesterday, 20:06   #329
Chris
Trollsplatter
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,233
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: The gender ideology thread

Well, seeing as we’re complaining, why not complain about the complaint. It might not change this particular decision but it might just make them pause and realise there is an administrative cost to this sort of politicking.

The web page with the judgment is here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/ecu/ne...l-21-june-2025

And you can complain about it here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/commen...Your%20comment

If you’re so motivated, you could suggest that the BBC has no remit to write contentious social theory into its newsroom scripts, that Croxall was quite correct to make an instant correction to use scientifically correct terminology, and that given what we all know about the BBC’s internal struggles with trans activism, the momentary eye-roll was really very restrained.

Whether or not anyone here complains, I bet the decision gets way more complaints than Croxall did. FYI the original issue was raised off the back of 20 complaints. That’s all. That’s basically our Richard plus a dozen or more members of the BBC’s own internal ‘Pride’ staff network. Hardly anyone at all outside of the BBC had any problem with this.
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote