[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by damien c

So I have not really kept up with this so please excuse me if I am missing something here.

First part:

I fail to understand why he is being labelled as a Pedo/Rapist etc, that is Andrew when from what I can see no seems to be able to prove he did anything?

The commentary on TV etc never mentions any police reports, DNA, the only thing that seems to be mentioned is "Her Words" and a "Photo" that they say people cannot confirm if it's legit or fake??

If that is all there is, then this is another case of a Man being found guilty of something just because a women says so and it's wrong, annoying and quite frankly sickening that again another man has his life ruined because of an allegation.


Second Part (Probably more important):
There is though the other side of it, that there are reports he paid her off after the first time she accused him and made her sign an NDA?

If that is the case, that makes him look real guilty to me because, I am sorry but no man knowing it will basically end his career, reputation etc sign an NDA and payoff a false accuser, so that makes me think there was something that happened??


The mainstream media and anti-royals seem to be saying that "Because he was friends with epstein he is guilty" but if that is the case, why are they not saying the same for everyone that was friends with him, why is it only Andrew?



Am I missing something here, is there more to this than what is being shown on the news etc or is it something that we will probably never know fully what was going on?

The man has never been charged with an offence or been near a court of law

people seem to be taking this book as the new gospel according to saint virginia, and as far as i can see this story is now about charlie windsor preserving his opulent lifestyle