Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
As previously requested, please provide evidence for this "blatant disregard for the law"?
The actors are hired to create adverts which have been shown to increase sales, financial performance, customer preference and loyalty, brand equity and market competitiveness - isn’t that the aim of adverts, and the fiduciary duty of the company?
Is using CGI meerkats or nodding dogs "blatant disregard for the law"?
|
I think OB is going down the wrong rabbit hole which is diluting the current point being discussed.
Positive discrimination, which is an oxymoron anyway, or DEI hires or anything like that is not the issue being discussed.
Over representation of minority groups , which then distorts the actual make up of the U.K. which then irritates the majority group, is what was being discussed, and in context the only question was….. if it is racist to make that observation, to which the answer is……absolutely not.