View Single Post
Old Today, 00:25   #1975
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,294
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Starmer’s chronicles

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
There is a cap on numbers. There also has to an "in" candidate.
All the others that also arrived in that 2 week period are not subject to the scheme. Those are good odds, given how many arrived with only 2(?) leaving.
If they have made a "dangerous crossing", they can't then claim to be seeking safety. Automatically asylum should be refused.

---------- Post added at 23:57 ---------- Previous post was at 23:39 ----------


UK
That rule for some reason doesn't apply to France or Germany, and possibly others. Weird that.

Link

Link

Not quite 5,000 crammed into a former airport in Germany.
Thank you for stepping up to the challenge which Old Boy has yet to take up.

However, your research does not answer my question below.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 View Post
Please provide links to show we're housing the majority of refugees in four-star hotels whilst France, Germany, etc house them in tents.
1andrew1 is online now   Reply With Quote