Thread: Starmer’s chronicles
View Single Post
Old Yesterday, 00:09   #1780
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,237
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
LinkNothing political about that?
I think you'll find that Seph and many others agree the judge's decision was legally correct. By law, the government has to house them.
And being chair of a think tank over 35 years ago does not indicate your current political leanings nor is it comparable to being appointed by the President.

---------- Post added at 00:09 ---------- Previous post was at 00:04 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
Irrelevant. The lack of principle still stands.
Last year

This month

Last month
Pure whataboutery. Two wrongs don't make a right. It's worse in Nottingham for if the local press don't get access to council information, no one else is going to show much interest. Whereas there will be plenty of other media scrutiny at the Labour Party Conference.
Last edited by 1andrew1; Yesterday at 00:14.
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote