[Sephiroth]

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

Meanwhile, a likely sigh of relief from the government as it overturns the injunction to remove asylum seekers from the Epping hotel.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...fac5ecf5&ei=12

Yes - it was always going to win that appeal. The Council did not process within the statutory period the hotel owner's application for change of use. That needed to be given due weight at the original injunction hearing. Also, the government had a clear interest at being a party to the case.

Massive screw-up by the Epping Council. They should withdraw their application because otherwise they will be hit for significant costs at the Epping public's expense.


---------- Post added at 16:42 ---------- Previous post was at 16:40 ----------

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

Meanwhile, a likely sigh of relief from the government as it overturns the injunction to remove asylum seekers from the Epping hotel.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...fac5ecf5&ei=12

---------- Post added at 16:32 ---------- Previous post was at 16:29 ----------


I think you're either getting confused with Reform and its refusal to work with the local press in Nottingham or with the Conservatives' ban on discussing the data breach of Afghanistan nationals who had worked for the UK.

What are you on about? The government is the one passing laws and free speech in the UK is under serious threat.