View Single Post
Old 28-08-2025, 17:17   #1756
Pierre
Permanently Banned
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,332
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Starmer’s chronicles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
You are making assumptions regarding "offence category" and "harm" - this explains why the Judge acted the way he did…

https://barristerblogger.com/2025/05...inst-sentence/



https://i0.wp.com/barristerblogger.c...aled.png?ssl=1



https://i0.wp.com/barristerblogger.c...aled.png?ssl=1


Quote:
Mrs Connolly’s solicitor advocate accepted that she had “intended to incite serious violence.” That gave the judge no option but to place her offence in Category A for culpability.
Did they ask her?

Anyway, I think we’ve done this to death now.

It may be that t’s were crossed and i’s dotted and all the legal people did everything right. Which just leaves me to say, in that case, the law is an ass.
Pierre is offline   Reply With Quote