View Single Post
Old 28-08-2025, 09:42   #1753
Pierre
The Dark Satanic Mills
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,063
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Starmer’s chronicles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
Which is what she got…

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/...y-Connolly.pdf

Paragraphs 24, 25, and first two sentences of para 26.
Actually no it wasn’t.

https://sentencingcouncil.org.uk/gui...l-orientation/

For culpability a lenient judge would gone for “Lesser Culpability”

Quote:
Reckless as to whether hatred would be stirred up (applicable to racial hatred offences only
What she did was reckless, no doubt.

And for Harm

Quote:
Statement/publication/performance or broadcast directly encourages activity which threatens or endangers life
Widespread dissemination of statement/publication/performance broadcast
What she said was not direct, it was an open statement “for all I care”, and she didn’t broadcast it widely others did that.

It was well within the Judges gift to sentence her to a community order. IMO the judge was swayed by Starmer’s rhetoric and gave an overly harsh sentence to make an example of her.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
Pierre is offline   Reply With Quote