View Single Post
Old 27-08-2025, 21:56   #1745
Pierre
Permanently Banned
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,332
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Starmer’s chronicles

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem View Post
But, should she be in prison, absolutely yes, for the simple fact that she pleaded guilty
I disagree, insofar that it was her first ever offence, she is non-violent, she is not a danger to the community, and there were mitigating mental health issues.

A community sentence and tag would have been more than sufficient.

She was made an example of under the tacit direction of the prime minister and political agitating judge.

Quote:
the Court had little option but to follow the sentencing guidelines.
That is an excellent point. I would love to know what the sentencing guidelines are for this.

More importantly what the minimum sentencing guidelines are, which is what she should have got.
Pierre is offline   Reply With Quote