[OLD BOY]

Originally Posted by Pierre

Who was she inciting exactly?

I refer you to a previous post, to you.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...postcount=1695

She was inciting violent racists in our society. Do you expect me to name them?

Would you take a different view if she was egging the crowd to do the same thing in the street?

---------- Post added at 15:20 ---------- Previous post was at 15:17 ----------

Originally Posted by Pierre

She was badly advised.

She appealed, in front of a judge not a jury.

Other similar cases indicate, in front a jury of people that believe hurty words are not something to be jailed for, and not a politicised judge.

She would have got off. I wouldn't have found her guilty over a tweet she deleted written in a fit of emotion, a woman that had experienced losing her own child, after 3 children brutely stabbed to death and several more injured.

Would you have found her guilty? Don't worry you don't have to answer and side step another question.

We're going over old ground anyway.

But to believe, there were several people sitting looking at twitter, who read that tweet and then thought, "She has spoken, she has given me a direct order, I must go and make a few molotov's"

laughable and would remove any agency from such individual.

Anyway, like I say, we've done this, we know where we all stand and it's the lovely lefties that seem to be all "authoritarian"...funny that.

‘Hurty words’ are one thing. Her post went well beyond that.

---------- Post added at 15:23 ---------- Previous post was at 15:20 ----------

Originally Posted by Carth

There's that vague word 'inciting' again.

Up there near the top of the list of deliberately anomalous and obfuscating words and phrases such as:

Potentially
Up To
As Little As
May Possibly
Could Eventually

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dic...glish/inciting

The meaning is very clear.