19-08-2025, 11:16
|
#1698
|
The Dark Satanic Mills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,048
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
My position is that she pled guilty to the crime - she accepted that she had intended to stir racial hatred, and suffered the consequences of that action.
The severity of the offence was increased by the fact that her tweet had been seen by 310,000* people (not 40)…
This sub stack explains the legal reasons why she was imprisoned (without any Telegraph or HopeNotHate slanting either way)
https://emptycity.substack.com/p/exp...h-sentence-for
* Pesky fact-checking again…
|
expertly dodged.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
|
|
|