|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
My position is that she pled guilty to the crime - she accepted that she had intended to stir racial hatred, and suffered the consequences of that action.
The severity of the offence was increased by the fact that her tweet had been seen by 310,000* people (not 40)…
This sub stack explains the legal reasons why she was imprisoned (without any Telegraph or HopeNotHate slanting either way)
https://emptycity.substack.com/p/exp...h-sentence-for
* Pesky fact-checking again…
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Last edited by Hugh; 19-08-2025 at 08:31.
|