Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
or two years for this
that was seen by about 40 people before it was deleted
This type of thing promotes distrust between the government and the governed, and the public and the police.
I don't think Jones should be in prison, but neither do I think Connolly should be imprisoned either. She should be released immediately and compensated.
|
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp3nn60wyr6o
Quote:
Her message was reposted 940 times and viewed 310,000 times
|
Quote:
In his sentencing remarks, external, Judge Melbourne Inman said Connolly's offence was "category A" - meaning "high culpability" - and that both the prosecution and her own barrister agreed she "intended to incite serious violence".
For Reader, this showed "they weren't arguing this was a silly tweet and she should be let off - her own counsel agreed this was a serious issue".
At her appeal, Connolly claimed that while she accepted she intended to stir up racial hatred, she always denied trying to incite violence.
|
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|