Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Ah, another standard OB debating technique … the ‘all you have to do is…’
… in which all you have to do is assume the problem has actually been solved. No evaluation, understanding or design required. All you have to do is make a box. Here’s one I made earlier.
And “the industry”, which doesn’t want to pay to keep using the reliable, well-understood thing they’ve been using for 20 years, will pay for this new thing that hasn’t been specified or designed, much less built and tested, because of course they just will.
|
The ‘problems’ you raise are non-problems, just as your ‘not enough electricity’ argument you rammed at me some years ago.
DTT could be improved as you say, but the point is that the broadcasters only want one system. You are not grasping that, are you?
---------- Post added at 20:41 ---------- Previous post was at 20:38 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K
Is it worth all the evangelical ' only my view matters' zeal though OB? It's only tv. You have one view , other have theirs. Accept to differ? Then go and do something worthwhile. Food banks always need volunteers and they don't argue about the future of TV...
|
If you read my most recent posts above, you would not come to that conclusion, Mr K. I’m putting forward what I think and looking for stumbling blocks to seeing that through to fruition. I’ve not heard anything credible to counteract my view yet, that is all.
That 2035 date I postulated 10 years ago is now all over the media, but it’s like water off a duck’s back on this forum!
