View Single Post
Old 10-05-2025, 18:23   #39
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 8,153
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: Pair guilty of cutting down Sycamore Gap tree

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymoss View Post
well protected trees yes. There are laws on cutting down trees too. Do you advocate law breaking on open forum?

---------- Post added at 12:28 ---------- Previous post was at 12:27 ----------



do you know these persons history?? their record?
Where somebody else cuts down a tree, protected or not, it might just about make local news. It wouldn't make national news and wouldn't be valued at over £600,000. Any record they might or might not have is irrelevant.
Just a massive unjustifiable over-reaction.

---------- Post added at 18:23 ---------- Previous post was at 18:21 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
The answer to your question is in the link in the OP.



I have read elsewhere additionally that for one of them there is a flight risk.
Why would they need protection? If they do, then arrest those attacking and harassing them.That especially includes the media.
nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote