View Single Post
Old 10-05-2025, 10:55   #33
peanut
NUTS !!
 
peanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,240
peanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny star
peanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny starpeanut has a nice shiny star
Re: Pair guilty of cutting down Sycamore Gap tree

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees View Post
If you read up on my earlier post I’m not saying that the tree doesn’t hold significance.

Justify why someone who is convicted of a violent offence can be given bail until sentencing , however for this offence the pair are remanded. Because after a quick Google


‘Remand before sentencing, or custodial remand, should be used as a last resort, only when there are compelling reasons to believe the defendant will not appear for court or might pose a danger to the public if released. Specifically, a judge might remand someone in custody if they believe the defendant is likely to abscond, commit further offenses while on bail, or might interfere with witnesses or the course of justice’
The law basically. Destruction of anything of value over £5k could be imprisonment for up to 10 years. Which kinds makes it a serious offence.

One of the 'idiots' wanted to be put on remand for their own protection.
__________________
Oh what fun it is
peanut is offline   Reply With Quote