Thread: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
View Single Post
Old 26-04-2025, 20:01   #19
OLD BOY
Rise above the players
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 with 360 software, ITVX, 4+, Prime, Netflix, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount+, Discovery+
Posts: 15,086
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
OLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronzeOLD BOY is cast in bronze
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K View Post
Maybe a tax on Sky/VM/Netflix etc. True it might come back to the customer, but those with the ability to pay for these extras. A basic tv service guarantee for all.
No, that’s simply mad. Voluntary subscriptions will ensure that only those who want to watch or listen to the BBC have to pay.

Why should people who don’t watch the BBC have to pay?

As the commercial channels receive most of their funding from advertisements and subscriptions, it is unfair to expect the viewers that tune into those channels to pay for a TV licence.
__________________
Forumbox.co.uk
OLD BOY is offline   Reply With Quote