Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymoss
Again I ask you about your naivety?
Anyway I will take the anecdotal evidence from people like Black Belt Barrister and ChilliJonCarne on youtube rather than discuss this matter with you any further. My view will not change and neither will yours so what is the point?
|
What about the little things called FACTS.
Still zero evidence of "targeting".
If a disproportionate number of women-only households, don't pay, get caught, and continue not to pay, then it is common sense that more women than men will be prosecuted. It's 74%/26% split, so not overwhelmingly disproportionate.
How would a household tax system change anything? Perhaps the German system of being per household regardless of owning equipment or viewing might be simpler. The issue of non-payment would still be there, so doesn't solve anything.
Link
Quote:
|
There is no evidence that TV Licensing deliberately discriminates against any group, and gender is not a factor in the way TV Licensing collects and enforces the licence fee.
|