Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
Well I read it as he did, you worded it very badly.  |
Perhaps you should read it again. You are simply not very good at grasping obvious points and you jump to conclusions. Anyway, you get it now, which is all that matters.
---------- Post added at 12:55 ---------- Previous post was at 12:47 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
No it never as Paul thought the same thing, anyone would've.
Yeah if only we hadn't surrendered our ability to send them back we wouldn't have to pay France anything
|
I said:
‘It’s a shame that France provides life jackets for these illegal immigrants to Britain. What the hell are we paying the French for?’
So you read the first sentence and make the worst assumption, without reading the second sentence.
I notice a few of you do this on Cable Forum, quite a lot. I don’t get this elsewhere.
---------- Post added at 12:59 ---------- Previous post was at 12:55 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
Why the hell do people think we can simply “send the boats back”? The French (or any other country) have no requirement to accept them and could theoretically send them straight back to us.
As previously mentioned, the result of a certain referendum from circa 2016 (which I won’t name in case it triggers anyone) took away our legal right to return these people.
|
Yes, good point, which is why we need a nominated third country to take them in. That’s what Rwanda would have achieved had it not been for the do-gooders who want to drown us with hordes of humanity flooding our shores and bringing this country down.
How some of you guys can support this I really cannot fathom. Don’t look to Starmer - he has no solutions.
---------- Post added at 13:00 ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
And risk our standing on the international stage by breaking several international laws by refusing them entry (clue: it’s not just about the ECHR)?
|
Who cares if the alternative is to bring Britain to its knees?
---------- Post added at 13:02 ---------- Previous post was at 13:00 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
Yes it’s about Starmer, and why he can’t just “turn them around”.
It’s not about having “the guts”, Starmer doesn’t have “the power” - again, removed from us after the result of 2016.
|
And you’re happy with this? Do you have any answers to this problem, because I haven’t heard them?