Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
I know you're not aiming that at anyone in particular, which ought to go without saying.
Given my long conversations with Dan over the past 2 decades, I'd stake my reputation that she'd never think that way or commit such crimes.
But as we all know, one person is one too many. It does happen.
I remain conflicted on this. I'm glad people like her still have protection in Law for their trans status. One of the only viable way forward to suit as many people as possible would be more gender-neutral toilets etc which of course will trigger many bigotted-types until it's been pointed out to them that disabled toilets have been that way for decades.
My employer has a LGBTQ+ forum group which is open to all, and we meet up each month. I joined so I could learn how to be a better Straight Ally, however, this does not mean I agree with all views put forward. This will no doubt be the main topic of discussion at the next meeting, and I'm eager to hear all opinions on the day.
|
The problem that the NHS woman would have with gender neutral toilets is that any man could enter, not just trans people, so they'd view it as being worse.
In order to comply with the law, a lot of licensed premises are making the female toilets gender neutral from this weekend.
It's a complicated issue. I saw a programme the other day where men who take on female roles aren't classed as men or women, but as something else. I can't remember the term, it was in India I think.