Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
It is roughly equal though.
|
Even the ONS admits that data is unrealiable because of the cack-handed way the question was asked. Aided and abetted, of course, by years of activism deliberately intended to obscure the meanings of words and make the issue impossible to discuss except in trans-affirming terms.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...dy/ar-AA1BGWlK
Quote:
|
The WHO also no longer classes transgenderism or ge Dysphoria as a mental illness. Since 2019.
|
As we have seen, public bodies are quite capable of being targeted and captured by activists. The reason today’s Supreme Court judgment was even necessary was because activists at organisations like Stonewall have spent years telling public bodies across the UK what it thinks the law should be rather than what it actually is.
The evidential basis for any firm conclusions are weak and in any case there is unlikely to be one single reason why someone claims a trans identity.
Here. Tbis graphic is American but despite differences in emphasis and language it describes the ‘trans umbrella’ as it operates in the UK fairly well.
---------- Post added at 21:36 ---------- Previous post was at 21:33 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
As 5ft 7.5inches is the average male height they wont look out of place then. Bearded woman lol. Many will have been undergoing hormone therapy and can perfectly pass for looking male.
|
In filtered social media photos maybe. But I have yet to see a trans-claiming female who can actually behave like a man rather than as a grotesque parody of one (just as trans-claiming males inevitably fall into stereotypes of what they believe to be women’s bahviour).
In any case, whether or not someone can ‘pass’ is a red herring. The issue is one of human dignity. I fail to see how a man or woman deceiving others into thinking they are something they are not is dignified for anyone concerned.