Quote:
Originally Posted by epsilon
I obviously don't have a problem with you "knowing" that there are other options. The problem is that you clearly know there are other options but then go on to define the future, solely based on your favoured option.
That isn't the future, it's a projection of your blinkered view.
|
You have just proved my point. Clearly, you and others cannot understand that my prediction as to what will happen is simply what I think will happen. I have acknowledged on a number of occasions that I could be wrong.
It is also true to say that I haven’t deviated much from how I see IPTV playing out, and I haven’t deviated much from that view, but I have never said that my prediction will come about no matter what.
---------- Post added at 17:49 ---------- Previous post was at 17:42 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by epsilon
PSB requirements have always been under review but there is no suggestion that they will be abolished.
Under review such as the debate over imposing a levy on streamers to fund UK based production which the DCMS seem to favour at the moment?
|
It appears that the main thrust of Ofcom’s view will be that PSBs must ‘innovate in content delivery, ensuring that they remain competitive and relevant. This involves embracing new technologies and platforms to reach audiences effectively.’
This does not necessarily mean that the government will require PSB channels to remain open, although of course, it’s possible that they might. But it’s not what the TV industry wants to see. They want just one means of transmission over the internet and ease of loading content.
So it’s an open question as to the eventual outcome, but I’ve told you what I think.
Is this clear enough for you?