Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
episilon, of course I know there are many options! What planet are you lot on?
All I am saying is that of all the options, barring government intervention, this is what I see happening.
Why are you having such a problem with that? And yes, I get it that you and others disagree. That is your right, of course. But I have no such rights to have an opinion that varies with yours. I get that, too.
|
I obviously don't have a problem with you "knowing" that there are other options. The problem is that you clearly know there are other options but then go on to define the future, solely based on your favoured option.
That isn't the future, it's a projection of your blinkered view.
---------- Post added at 00:46 ---------- Previous post was at 00:38 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Hugh - the PSB requirements are under review.
I doubt those views expressed in your post will hold up. Yes, I know it is a popular view on here that there will be a mix, but do you really believe that Skywill continue topay for expensive transponders when an alternative is available that will save them money?
Additionally, carrying on the live TV channels is an extra burden and an extra cost to broadcasters. I think the only thing that will save the conventional TV channels is the government itself.
|
PSB requirements have always been under review but there is no suggestion that they will be abolished.
Under review such as the debate over imposing a levy on streamers to fund UK based production which the DCMS seem to favour at the moment?