Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees
‘All men represent a threat to women’
|
In case you weren’t aware ……it’s that one. I would insert the word “potentially” though.
And Trans-women, I reject the term but will use it, are men
---------- Post added at 19:06 ---------- Previous post was at 19:03 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees
I’ve got a good friend who is trans male to female and I’d love to put her in a room with you whilst some of you talk the way you do on the issue, you would be picking your teeth up from the floor in seconds
|
Point proven.
So your lovely “women” is capable of breaking a few jaws is she? Has a temper? Thanks for making it clear to everyone.
---------- Post added at 19:09 ---------- Previous post was at 19:06 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees
Not really.Come to boro and you would find in most cases that the women are quicker to get physical and much much more aggressive…..
|
Yes, I have a Yorkshire terrier that is very aggressive and ready to fight. A pit bull would end him in one second…..
---------- Post added at 19:17 ---------- Previous post was at 19:09 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
And yet your trans friend is considered a man with no accommodation.
|
Because he is. He can dress up and go about his business, no problem.
Quote:
|
More over they have a "psychological disorder"
|
Yes they do, are you suggesting they don’t?
Quote:
|
and so represent a danger to "real" women.
|
“Some” potentially do.
I’m intrigued as to why you have “real” in inverted commas? But at least it means you acknowledge that they are not women.
---------- Post added at 19:20 ---------- Previous post was at 19:17 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
will be regarded as a mentally ill freak.
|
Well, that’s your term, nobody else’s.