Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 13-03-2025, 16:03   #2535
nffc
cf.mega poster
 
nffc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 41
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,432
nffc has a nice shiny star
nffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny starnffc has a nice shiny star
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
The MMR was never controversial. It suffered at the hands of a quack, wilfully bad research, credulous newspapers who made money off lurid headlines and other moral cowards who preferred to “both-sides” the debate rather than seriously engaging with the issue.

The controversy was not the MMR, but rather the lamentable way misinformation about it was given credibility and allowed to spread in ways that had real-world effects in the lives of children who suffered, and in some cases died, as a result.
Yes it was, but it's much easier once misinformation had been put out (intentionally or otherwise) for it to remain in people's minds and even if later things correct it, it doesn't reverse the initial damage. You only need to look at where this has happened elsewhere to see this.


The MMR was not causing kids to develop autism, they likely had it anyway but it wouldn't come out until that age, so some people thought there was a correlation there when there was none. Can we say the same about people developing heart issues or having strokes after vaccinations (although covid can do that too)? It's still possible there the evidence hasn't built up enough, either way.
__________________


nffc is offline   Reply With Quote