Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
No idea who he is, but it looks like the share price mentioned more than doubled, rather than more than trippled (as claimed).
Even if you take the figures quoted by "a spokesperson" (to defend him) - 47.5p to 141p is not more than trippled, in fact its not quite even trippled.
Maths is clearly not their strongpoint either.  |
2.97 times is not that far off is it? Anyway the share price rose above 150 by the end of that year, so that IS more than 3 times.
Claiming you were an economist, when you weren't, and claiming to have worked for 10 years when it was 5 and a half with one year studying, are on another level.