Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
The bills already being watered down, they're trying to remove the judicial oversight element in favour of a expert panel, the thing I've always worried about was once introduced it'd be watered down due to discrimination over time, I never envisaged it'd get watered down before it became law though  |
The committee was stacked with true believers. It was always going to be shredded back to its ideological bare bones at this stage. The only silver lining here is that sound oversight is the only reason some MPs voted for it at 2nd reading. Without that, they may not stick with it. It doesn’t need too many MPs to change their vote to fall.