View Single Post
Old 04-02-2025, 23:07   #791
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,268
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Starmer’s chronicles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
The 24th is because that's when Starmer was giving his speech about Brexit. It was filmed at Labour HQ and she was in attendance.
Ah, that makes sense.

---------- Post added at 23:03 ---------- Previous post was at 23:00 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Yeah, I misread some details about it earlier.

The point is, a 50-mile journey was made. That is not trivial, especially not on Christmas Eve, particularly not during a pandemic when there are legal restrictions on movement.

Starmer caused that journey to be made, apparently just so she could give him a hand.
I'm not condoning the 50 miles, just knew that figure made no sense as Starmer lives in London.

---------- Post added at 23:07 ---------- Previous post was at 23:03 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
He was still her "employer", so had responsibility for her making the journey.
He wouldn't employ her, just contract her services. She's doubtless got her own company and it would be her responsibility to adhere to the laws of the land. But those who contracted her services must have considered the implications of employing someone based outside London.
1andrew1 is online now   Reply With Quote