|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
I wonder how this will play out? It doesn't sound as open and shut a case as some but we need more info to judge.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...7a969914&ei=10
---------- Post added at 14:53 ---------- Previous post was at 14:41 ----------
Your three sources don't back up this bold allegation. They demonstrate that Reeves is worse on Truss than just one measure.
That's not tanking the economy worse than Truss did, by any stretch of the imagination!
I posted before the election that winning it for whichever party was going to be a poisoned chalice due to the state that public services were, the debt that we were in and the lack of growth. Nothing's changed on this front but it's a shame the government can't be honest with the electorate and explain that more money is needed due to Covid and under-funding and you will have to pay for it. That being said, a song and dance is being made about employers' NI contributions. I'm sympathetic on that to some extent, but I'm also aware that it's restoring employer NI rates to what they once were under the Conservatives. |
Interesting new tactic, chuck tulip to the wolves while you defend Rachael from customer services
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|