Far too many awkward questions to be answered with an inquiry.
Eg Why are they referred as "Asian gangs", when the common factor is Islam(eg groups of Somalis, especially in the Netherlands). How did the gangs form so easily with friends, neighbours, workmates. How did they easily find others wanting to abuse in other town and cities that the girls were trafficked to. IMO they aren't paedophiles as such, it's just girls that happened to be young and could be controlled easily.
Other types of gangs are where the primary motive is being paedophiles which don't form easily, and postcode gangs, where the motives are not sexual at all.
---------- Post added at 09:47 ---------- Previous post was at 09:33 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
And has been pointed out, facts (the Circular he mentioned) contradict what he said, so whilst he may be "considered a reliable source" normally, in this instance, he isn’t - he was repeating what he had been told by others, and what they told him was incorrect.
|
He himself received a copy of the document. He was speaking first hand. Three years earlier, a police officer (DC Tony Crookes of South Yorkshire Police) also made the claim.
Link
Quote:
6. To ensure good record management practice, the Crown Prosecution Service operates a
schedule of retention and destruction of records. We only hold records when they have value
and wil dispose of them when it is not proportionate for them to be retained. The retention
schedule identifies and categorises different class of records and defines how long they should
be retained for. The schedule in operation in 2008 states that administrative files should be
held for 5 years and then destroyed if no longer required. A memorandum from the Home
Office would likely have been considered as an administrative file and would have been subject
to this schedule of destructions.
|