View Single Post
Old 13-12-2024, 11:20   #8508
Taf
cf.mega poster
 
Taf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kairdiff-by-the-sea
Age: 69
Services: TVXL BBXL Superhub 2ac (wired) 1Tb Tivo
Posts: 10,229
Taf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny star
Taf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny starTaf has a nice shiny star
Re: Moans and Pet Hates - Part 8

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ View Post
They have not been cherry-picked. Just because they go against your narrative there’s no need say such silly things
The police were asked to provide data and they asked "What data? How do you want it collated?

Accident reports between pedestrians and riders/drivers have many criteria on what boxes to tick, including:

Lack of attention / loss of concentration of a pedestrian.
Lack of attention / loss of concentration of a rider/driver.
Excessive speed with relation to set limits or conditions.
Alcohol, drug and/or prescription use of a pedestrian.
Alcohol, drug and/or prescription use of a rider/driver.

"With regard to pedestrian casualties, ‘pedestrian failed to look properly’ with ‘pedestrian careless, reckless or in a hurry’ were named as factors in 4,100 casualty collisions – 23% of the overall total.

‘Pedestrian crossing road masked by stationary or parked vehicle’ with ‘pedestrian failed to look properly’ accounted for 1,961 casualties (11%).

‘Pedestrian failed to judge vehicle’s path or speed’ with ‘pedestrian careless, reckless or in a hurry’ caused 1,204 casualties (7%), while ‘pedestrian crossing road masked by stationary or parked vehicle’ with ‘pedestrian careless, reckless or in a hurry’ was responsible for 1,013 casualties (6%)."

https://roadsafetygb.org.uk/news/iam...n-safety-4565/
Taf is offline   Reply With Quote