|
Re: A Duty To Die?
There are pros and cons.
Pro (a bit cynical, perhaps): the person doesn't cost the NHS more than the injection. It frees up a bed, and they are short of them. Plus organ donation? For me, when I clock out, in the unlikely event I have anything useful by then, I say let it be used.
Con: if this option had been available years ago, we might not have had Stephen Hawking. He lasted years longer than predicted. I fondly remember him in ST: TNG, "Descent part 1", getting the better of Data, Newton and Einstein on the holodeck.
Pro: the person is relieved of suffering. I don't think they should suffer longer than they have to. Isn't it more civilised to let them choose?
Con: what if the person's in a coma and/or unfit to decide?
I honestly don't know. I do think the right to live as long as you want to includes the right to die when you want to - but there must be safeguards.
__________________
"People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'."
- Agent Phil Coulson, S.H.I.E.L.D.
WINDOWS 11, ANYONE?!
|