Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
What is said to be flimsy evidence on misdemeanours that were outside the statue of limitations. Completely bogus charges.
|
No - he is civilly liable for sexual assault due to the statute of limitations on criminal charges in that case. But he is a convicted felon (criminal) on 34 charges of falsifying business records arising from his failed attempt to cover up hush-money payments to a porn star. There was nothing bogus or flimsy in any of that.