Quote:
Originally Posted by cheekyangus
Significant reasons include simply that the telecommunications infrastructure isn’t close to being resilient enough and on a consistent and near universal basis, and it won’t be for a quite some time if those delivering the content persist on using the capacity so inefficiently, and continue to make technical choices that fail to change this. If they keep with the current approach even those in the better areas will suffer a subpar experience and there will be far too many who just won’t get a service at all and could be 2nd class citizens as there isn’t the will to do what it takes to maintain a service to them, new tech or old, because the companies are looking at this in too simplified, an unhuman, a way. I don’t want anyone being left out of society because some companies decided the data/numbers don’t work. We could end up with a sizeable minority effectively cut off with some of the strategies some organisations are adopting.
|
You may have noticed that I sidestep his attempts to steer the discussion to the 2035 fantasy. Replying just gives him further opportunities to go back into repeat mode.
---------- Post added at 17:48 ---------- Previous post was at 17:35 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
So because you don't use them, they are described as 'minor features'.
|
I think Virgin should take his minor streaming feature away and force him to watch linear broadcast content.
Seriously though, this is why I say he is preaching. This is his gospel. He has a vision for the futures and what anyone else wants doesn't matter to him, he'll just keep on trying to persuade everyone that there is only one way forward. His way!