Quote:
Originally Posted by Media Boy UK
Why did Tiny Pop return to other network for then if streaming THAT good?
|
It’s financials that will determine how long the smaller channels are able to survive. I would imagine that Tiny Pop is able still to make a profit at present. What I’m saying is that as income from advertisements diminishes over time, they will have to close. They won’t continue to run at a loss.
---------- Post added at 17:19 ---------- Previous post was at 17:00 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by epsilon
Of course you explain your comments, you keep having to explain your comments because people don't agree with you. Is EE really "throwing everything in with Sky"? it looks as if they are exiting the TV business and simply retailing Sky. Comcast is, primarily, a cable company. Hardly surprising that Satellite isn't the best fit for them in the long term.
It doesn't matter if you are persuaded by my "conclusions", if a service provider keeps withdrawing parts of the service, the customer will eventually say, "that's it, no more". It seems to be the way things are going with Virgin.
Sure, it's a discussion forum but you insist on preaching that your vision of the streaming future is the only way forward. Despite people telling you they don't want that.
|
I find this incredible, I really do! I get it that some people disagree with me, but expecting me to explain over and again exactly what I mean and why I think that puzzles me. Never mind.
I think we are saying the same thing about EE - their viewers are being shunted over to Sky Stream.
As far as customers voting with their feet because some minor features are no longer available is concerned, I would simply ask if you know any other company that offers these features? You know as well as I do what the answer to that is.
I am not ‘preaching’ to anyone. Are you preaching to me when you argue that everything will continue as now because that’s just what (some) people want? Of course not. We are simply exchanging views, aren’t we?