Chris

Ok, so, you’re just going to repeat one of the strawmen you posted earlier. So, let me repeat: it is nothing to do with an objective assessment of whether a boxer is ‘too strong’ - that would be absurd. It is everything to do with whether a boxer qualifies under the eligibility rules that always have - and always should - apply to female sports, namely that the competitor is female biological sex, thereby not having the male advantage that as a class renders elite sportswomen unable to compete with elite sportsmen.

If you’re still content to believe everything that has been said is just ‘rumours and false info’ and are unwilling to engage critically with any of it, then you’re being wilfully blind.