Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
|
If they followed a cheek swab with a visual exam of some kind, then that absolutely would remain confidential - just as nobody would describe the specifics of how they watched an athlete giving a urine sample (which they do).
Look … we are way, way past casting aspersions on what the WBA has said. the IOC has
seen the results and could have stopped a PR disaster in its tracks, simply by saying the tests, which incidentally were handled by a CAS-approved lab, were not credible. They didn’t.
The IOC instead chose to ignore the tests and pursued eligibility criteria based on a marker in a passport. That’s a political, ideological choice.