Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
And kept them on his phone.
Yet he still remained a member of that group.
He was only caught out because of an investigation into somebody else. Just shows that there was no original investigations into his activities.
Unfortunately he may dodge a prison sentence as the sender wasn't jailed.
Link |
Yes, there's absolutely no fair way that HE can go down for this when the sender wasn't jailed.
But he was still being sent images of children in August 2021 after requesting adults only in February 2021.
There isn't a lot which can defend this behaviour, because you can simply either report it, delete the content from your phone (even though technically that doesn't stop the fact you were making CP by being sent a copy), leave the group, block the sender, etc. Indeed getting this content presumably doesn't happen randomly anyway
He didn't and it's the scale of the stuff he was sent along with the nature and the repeated occurrence over time which is the key thing here.
---------- Post added at 19:06 ---------- Previous post was at 19:05 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmj260e54x7o
That statement may not be factually correct
Which may be the reason the police did not find any on his phone when they investigated him initially…
fyi, this is not a defence of Edwards - his behaviour was abhorrent, but factual accuracy is important.
|
Totally agree with bib
There's a lot wrong here. But there's also a lot of sensationalism which means people will be misled by headlines, from what actually did happen.