Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
If somebody is unable to debate/discuss a known subject, they are not going to be able to debate/discuss a new subject that can come up before a President. Somebody will put forward proposal X, and a President, CEO, etc, should be able to debate/discuss the pros and cons. The alternative is to have to blindly accept proposal X without understanding why.
A good example of blindly accepting something without debate/discussion is Paula Vennells and the Horizon scandal at the Post Office.
|
Directly from you quote
‘don’t debate as well as I used to’
Now, not being able to do something as well as you could before does not equate to that you’re unable to do it. Which is what you claimed
Make sense ? Or do we need to get the crayons out ?