Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Whether you recognise your own misunderstand or not is irrelevant to whether you are or not.
|
You misunderstand my understanding, ol’ chap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
I guess I should at least accept your recognition of the low cost streaming future being a myth as progress.
And quite right too if they feel that the ever increasing number of products in the marketplace offer poor value relative to other forms of entertainment.
|
If we are talking about sport, I have acknowledged already that access to these events is too costly, but it’s not exactly cheap on Sky either. However, I think prices will come down as the markets consolidate.
As far as general entertainment goes, it has become much cheaper than to subscribe to Sky’s multi- channel packages and the choice is much greater, particularly when you factor in the ability to change streamers as often as every month.
The streamers are now talking to each other about consolidating or bundling different streamers to provide better choices at less cost for the consumer. The same will happen in the sports arena over time, probably sooner rather than later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
There’s no basis for this prophecy any more than your 2035 one so forgive me for scoffing at your so-called “reassurance”.
|
Nonsense, jfman. The Beeb is already well on the way in their planning for the replacement of their TV channels within a decade in favour of a streamer for example, and it is most likely that our existing broadcast system will be turned off in 2035. You’re just ignoring the facts to prolong your wet dream that the channels are here to stay forever. I’m afraid you are going to have to content yourself with a miriad of inferior FAST channels to feast on in the future. [/QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Bundling of content - another benefit of “streamers” bites the dust as you need to buy content that you don’t want in order to get the content you do. Linear channels and bundles of content. Where have I seen that before.  |
That depends how they bundle it. As you know, bundling channels means more choice for less expenditure, which is how the multi-channel system on Sky works. Unfortunately, this system is falling apart due to the fact that so many programmes are going straight to the streamers, leaving the channels floundering to put anything decent on.
The streamer bundles will have plenty of choice with decent material. I dare say there will be the option to take just one streamer, or alternatively, the whole caboosh for a lower price than subscribing individually. We will have to see how that pans out.
Hopefully, there will also be subscriptions with ads options for those who cannot fork out too much on this or who simply don’t want to.
---------- Post added at 10:41 ---------- Previous post was at 10:37 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
The Public Service Broadcasting remit…
|
So? New legislation would fix that, but I have already said that it could still be made to work with the government paying content providers for showing the content they want people to have. This could be done programme by programme or a binding commitment between the provider and the government to show a given percentage of programmes of a given kind.